Results from the votings in the experiment:
Saturday
30/5, around 21:00 in the evening:
Dietary question. 22 persons voted initially, 12 persons voted
in the 5 minutes long second round (2 alternatives got equal votes)
Result: of 3 alternatives the middle one
won and I will change my diet accordingly. A moderate change.
Midnight
Saturday 30/5-Sunday:
Datingquestion. 22 persons voted
Twitter voted in unison for the more
radical path of action.
Saturday
morning about 08:30:
Exercise question. 12 answers which again ended in a tie. 2 persons
voted in the 5 minutes long second round. 2 persons sent me out running
Saturday
morning around 09:00:
Clothes question. Three alternative
outfits, divided into comfortable, elegant and casual. 9 votes for elegant, 5
for casual and only 3 for comfortable. Again, twitter went for the more radical
option.
Saturday
morning around 11:
Dating question. 19 answers, 15 for a more
cautious approach, 4 for impulsive behaviour. Twitter sent me in a more
responsible direction . It is to be expected that democracy has a longer
perspective than short-term satisfaction.
Conclusion so far:
voting participation is sufficient for this experiment to work. The alternatives (which are all alternatives I seriously consider) seem to either divide my followers very evenly or be in complete unison over one decision. I can not predict the outcomes.
Some liberals have tried to get me to do what I want. Damn liberals, you make poor submissives! What I want is democracy! ;-)
How do I feel about this? Relieved to not have to make decisions. And it has changed my behaviour on most points of voting so far.
Thank you so much for participating!
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar